From a small photo I found recently.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anyone identify this rider?
Collapse
X
-
Unidentified rider
I've resisted coming up with a name just in case someone has more info but judging by the date and knowing Peter's riding style I would hazard a guess that it is Peter Vine although the quality of the shot make it a trifle speculative.
Druid
Comment
-
Guest
Identify this rider
Originally posted by Brian Catt View PostFrom a small photo I found recently.
It is 52/101 the prototype scrambler from 1952? I was a lucky guy. The reg number is GJN 269 and the bike still exists but it has been dreadfully restored into a glittering mess thereby destroying all it's patina and history.
These pictures were from the Yeovil Festival of Transport in 1984. I took the bike along and rose it in the display arena. I also rode the bike in a VMCC South West coast run the same year. Tried to ride it in a couple of trials but fell off all the time and realised that it was too important to chance any damage. I sold the bike to Andrew King and he subsequently sold it on to the soulless guy who at great cost ... ruined it.
Might well be the bike in your picture.
Comment
-
52/101 (XP4) is owned by and was restored by a GRA Committee member. He is a friend and one of the most dedicated Greeves enthusiasts I've ever met. His level of knowledge of the early bikes is unparalleled.
He has assembled the world's best collection of early Greeves off-roaders, and all are skilfully restored to as-new condition. Because that is what he does.
Many of them feature in the new book, and thank goodness for his collection. Without it I'd have been sunk.
He has preserved some very rare bikes for posterity, many of them from wrecks. They're his bikes, and as always he can do what he likes with them and good luck to him.Last edited by Colin Sparrow; 16/10/2014, 06:31 AM.Colin Sparrow
Comment
-
I think Colin has point here, had the bike not have passed into the ownership of Dave Bradley & got a full restoration then (like 7 LHK) it would probably have just been discarded as just another 'old bike', & lost forever.
Whilst I agree with Keith that in certain cases bikes are best left unrestored & with their provenance intact but GJN 269 had obviously had a load of mods by the time it passed from you Keith & at least its now back as it would have been when it was built, & is a 'living example' that can be used for future reference & available to be seen & not existing as a rusty heap in someones shed, as could easily have happened after Andrew King decided to sell it.
Comment
-
Points well made colin, tactfull & to the point, without having to mention the restorers name!Last edited by dave higgins; 16/10/2014, 08:35 PM.
Comment
-
No need for that!
Keith, everyone has there opinion on how there bike should look, wether it be an as is effect or a full blown rest job, its what ever floats your boat, so when two opinions collide.. no problem, thats the way it is... just opinions.
This is a forum to air your views after all....
Comment
Comment